If the Trump administration wants to use tariffs to fight “persistent” goods trade imbalances, the right statute is Section 122 of the Trade Act, not the International Emergency Economic ...

If the Court blesses the president’s use of emergency powers to evade Congress, the consequences would be profound.

Simon Johnson & Stan A. Veuger urge the US Supreme Court to rule against the Trump administration's “reciprocal tariffs.” ...

Trump tariff case before Supreme Court could reshape presidential power. Global trade uncertainty grows as justices weigh ...

Ky., and three other Republicans voted with Democrats to strike down President Donald Trump's 10% tariffs on countries ...

Trump’s allies defend his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping tariffs by insisting that Congress can end the underlying “national emergency.” They argue that if ...

Updated on Oct. 31 at 8:42 a.m. On Nov. 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a pair of challenges to President Donald Trump’s power to impose sweeping […] ...

Five Republican U.S. senators joined Democrats Tuesday to terminate President Donald Trump’s national emergency that ...

A bipartisan group of former judges warned the Supreme Court could dangerously alter the power dynamic between the three ...

The Senate on Thursday passed a resolution aimed at ending President Donald Trump’s global tariffs introduced last spring, ...

The Trump administration stressed that if the Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping tariffs, it will undermine his global trade policy.