Andy Warhol violated a photographer’s copyright when he used her picture of Prince as the basis for 13 silkscreen portraits nearly 40 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled.

In 2019, a New York federal judge sided with Warhol that the Prince series qualifies as a new and distinct piece of art by incorporating a new meaning and message. But a federal appeals court in ...

Warhol died in 1987, and the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts assumed ownership of his work. When Prince died in 2016 , Vanity Fair’s parent company, Condé Nast, published a special ...

Washington — The Supreme Court on Wednesday wrestled with a copyright fight between rock-and-roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation over the late artist's use of her ...

WASHINGTON — Andy Warhol’s posters of Prince, some shaded purple and others orange, may have been works of art, but they infringed the copyright of the photographer who captured the original ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a photographer who claimed the late Andy Warhol should have honored her copyright on a photo of the rock star Prince when creating an iconic artistic image ...

Opinion Why Andy Warhol’s ‘Prince’ Is Actually Bad, and the Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith Decision Is Actually Good. We need to reboot the arguments we make about appropriation art.

An Andy Warhol portrait rejected by Donald Trump more than 40 years ago is up for auction — and the pop artist’s diaries revealed that his first impression of the future president is that he ...

Andy Warhol once said “Art is what you can get away with.” Now a legal fight surrounding his prints of Prince threatens to upend the world of pop art as well as music, books, and videos.

In a copyright battle with major implications, the justices heard arguments in a dispute over whether the artist's alterations to a photograph of Prince should be considered a new work.