News

The New Republic on MSN4dOpinion
The Supreme Court Says Laws Aren’t Real
To cover the Supreme Court these days is to catalogue its lawlessness. The conservative justices’ latest decision in McMahon ...
While the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is pushing the law rightward, the justices appointed by GOP presidents ...
Mark Joseph Stern: Under federal law, Trump cannot remove Powell over a policy disagreement. Federal law expressly allows for ...
The Roberts Court has asked for reargument in a key redistricting case, a move that strongly suggests the conservative ...
In their decision allowing the Trump administration to dismantle the Department of Education, the justices didn’t offer one ...
By a two-to-one margin, the public believes justices prioritize politics over the law. That's a disaster for the Supreme ...
Without explanation, the majority blocked lower court orders halting President Trump’s dismantling of the Department of ...
New analysis reveals the justices with whom Barrett most and least agreed during the Court's most recent term.
Many legal commentators apparently believe that, in the term that just ended, the Supreme Court further enabled President ...
In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.